Noncitizen Voting Ballot Measures in Eight States This Fall
As the 2020 U.S. presidential election approaches, conversations about noncitizen voting are growing louder. This is due in part to the efforts of several states, where ballot measures have been proposed to allow noncitizens to vote in local elections. While the idea of noncitizen voting may be controversial to some, it is gaining support and momentum as a way to increase civic engagement and promote inclusivity.
Currently, there are eight states that will have noncitizen voting measures on their ballots this fall: New York, Massachusetts, Maryland, California, Illinois, New Jersey, Maine, and Vermont. Each state has its own unique proposal, but the overall goal is the same – to allow noncitizens who are legally residing in the United States to vote in local elections.
New York is one of the states leading the charge on this issue. The state legislature recently passed a bill that would allow noncitizens to vote in local elections, and it now awaits approval from Governor Andrew Cuomo. If passed, New York would join other cities such as San Francisco, Chicago, and Washington D.C. in allowing noncitizen voting.
Supporters of noncitizen voting argue that it is a way to promote civic engagement among immigrant communities. By allowing noncitizens to have a voice in their local government, it gives them a sense of belonging and investment in their communities. It also allows for their concerns and issues to be heard and addressed by elected officials.
Furthermore, noncitizen voting has the potential to increase voter turnout. Many noncitizens are heavily involved in their communities, but are unable to vote due to their citizenship status. By giving them the opportunity to vote in local elections, it can lead to a more diverse and representative electorate.
Opponents of noncitizen voting argue that it goes against the principle of being a citizen and undermines the value of citizenship. However, it is important to note that noncitizen voting would only apply to local elections and not federal or state elections. Local elections often deal with issues that directly affect the community, such as school board elections or local tax policies. Allowing noncitizens to vote in these elections would not diminish the value of citizenship, but rather promote community involvement and representation.
Moreover, some opponents argue that noncitizens may not have a deep understanding of local issues and may not be informed enough to make educated decisions. However, this argument can also be applied to citizens who may not be fully informed about local issues. The solution to this is not to restrict voting rights, but to promote education and civic engagement for all members of the community.
It is also important to note that noncitizen voting is not a new concept. In fact, it has been practiced in some form throughout American history. For example, before the 1920s, many states allowed noncitizens to vote in local and state elections. Even today, some cities and towns in Maryland, Massachusetts, and Illinois allow noncitizens to vote in local elections.
The push for noncitizen voting also aligns with the growing trend of inclusivity and diversity in our society. The United States is a country built on the contributions of immigrants, and allowing noncitizens to have a say in local elections is a way to recognize and honor their contributions. It also sends a message of acceptance and inclusivity, which is especially important in today’s political climate.
In conclusion, the debate over noncitizen voting is gaining momentum and will be put to the test in eight states this fall. While there may be valid concerns and arguments against it, the potential benefits of noncitizen voting cannot be ignored. It promotes civic engagement, increases voter turnout, and recognizes the contributions of immigrants to our society. As we continue to strive towards a more inclusive and representative democracy, noncitizen voting is a step in the right direction.
