Wednesday, February 18, 2026

Blocking ICE cooperation fueled Minnesota unrest, officials warn as Virginia

ICE Arrests Increase in Sanctuary States as Local Cooperation is Praised by Federal Officials; Kentucky and Alabama Leaders Stand in Contrast

In recent years, the topic of immigration and the role of local law enforcement agencies in enforcing federal immigration laws has been a hotly debated issue. This debate has only intensified as ICE (Immigration and Customs Enforcement) arrests have surged in sanctuary states, while federal officials praise the cooperation of local authorities in preventing chaos. This stark contrast in approaches has been highlighted by leaders in Kentucky and Alabama, who have stood firm on their stance towards immigration enforcement.

Sanctuary states, also known as “safe havens”, are those that limit cooperation with federal immigration authorities in order to protect undocumented immigrants from deportation. These states have been at the center of controversy, with some arguing that they are promoting lawlessness and endangering public safety, while others argue that they are protecting vulnerable communities.

However, recent statistics from ICE have shown a significant increase in arrests in these sanctuary states. In the first quarter of 2019 alone, ICE arrested over 10,000 individuals in these states, a 40% increase from the same period in 2018. This surge in arrests has been attributed to the lack of cooperation from local authorities, who are not honoring detainers or sharing information about undocumented immigrants with federal agencies.

In contrast, states like Kentucky and Alabama have taken a different approach. These states have not declared themselves as sanctuary states, and their law enforcement agencies have been actively working with ICE to enforce federal immigration laws. This has been praised by federal officials, who argue that this cooperation is crucial in maintaining public safety and preventing chaos.

In a recent statement, Acting ICE Director Matthew Albence commended the efforts of local law enforcement in these states, stating that “their cooperation has been instrumental in keeping our communities safe and preventing criminals from being released back onto our streets.” He also emphasized that ICE’s priority is to target and arrest those who pose a threat to public safety, such as convicted criminals and gang members.

Kentucky Governor Matt Bevin has been a vocal supporter of this approach, stating that “we have a responsibility to enforce the laws of our country and protect our citizens.” He has also expressed concern that sanctuary policies in other states are putting the safety of their citizens at risk.

Similarly, Alabama Governor Kay Ivey has stood firm on her stance towards immigration enforcement, stating that “we must do everything in our power to ensure the safety and security of our citizens.” She has also signed a law that prohibits sanctuary policies in the state and requires local law enforcement to cooperate with federal immigration authorities.

The contrasting approaches of these states have sparked a debate on the effectiveness of sanctuary policies and the role of local authorities in enforcing federal immigration laws. While some argue that these policies are necessary to protect vulnerable communities, others argue that they are promoting lawlessness and endangering public safety.

In the midst of this debate, one thing is clear – the cooperation of local law enforcement is crucial in maintaining public safety and preventing chaos. As ICE arrests continue to surge in sanctuary states, it is evident that the lack of cooperation from local authorities is hindering the agency’s efforts to target and arrest those who pose a threat to our communities.

In conclusion, the recent surge in ICE arrests in sanctuary states has shed light on the importance of local cooperation in enforcing federal immigration laws. While some states continue to promote sanctuary policies, leaders in states like Kentucky and Alabama have stood firm on their stance towards immigration enforcement. As this debate continues, it is important to remember that the safety and security of our communities should always be the top priority.

Don't miss